Legal Opinion

Katz v. Moessinger

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 13, 1880Published

Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Gr. Rogers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This was an action of assumpsit, brought on the 14th day of Kovember, 1878, by Charles Moessinger, for the use of Charles F. Schumacher, against Andrew Katz, to recover for certain moneys paid by the plaintiff in satisfaction of judgments recovered upon two promissory notes, dated May 13, 1870, executed by the plaintiff jointly” with the defendant, and as his surety. To the declaration containing only the common money counts, the defendant pleaded non assumpsit, and afterwards, by leave of the court filed a plea puis darrein continuance, averring that on the 21st day of February, 1879, there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wachter v. AlbeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Stilwell v. CoopeNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Ex parte NewhallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1842
  4. Hornthall v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  5. Marshall v. TracyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API