Cantrell v. Buck
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.
This is a suit to enjoin the maintenance of a dam and irrigation ditches on premises of the plaintiffs and to recover damages suffered thereby.
At the close of plaintiffs’ ease, defendants moved for judgment on the evidence, dissolving the temporary injunction and dismissing the complaint. The motion was sustained, and, from the final judgment following, plaintiffs have appealed.
Counsel agree that the motion sustained by the court is equivalent to a demurrer to the evidence.
Admittedly, plaintiffs had shown their ownership of the premises, and the intrusion by the defendants. The theory of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sais v. City Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
- Navajo Live Stock & Trading Co. v. Gallup State BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RodgersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
- H. A. Seinsheimer & Co. v. JacobsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- Walters v. BattenfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hanks v. WalkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. O'BrienNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982