Legal Opinion

Overbeck v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1976No. 2-774A156PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This case represents the latest, if not the last, consumer-oriented challenge to the legality of a revolving charge account under since-repealed general usury laws. Here plaintiff-appellant Karl Overbeck, individually and as the representative of the class of Indiana credit card customers of defendant-appellee Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Sears) during 1968 and 1969, seeks some $6,000,000 of allegedly usurious “interest” collected from the members of plaintiff class under the “Sears Revolving Charge Account.” The trial court, adhering to the logic which compelled our brethren of the First District…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hogg v. RuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. State v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State Ex Rel. Turner v. Younker Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Rollinger v. JC Penney CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. Spiegel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API