Legal Opinion

Odato v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEADBETTER.

Richard P. Odato appeals from the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), which affirmed the referee’s decision denying unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Section 1201 of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex.Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. § 911(b)(9).1 The Board concluded that Odato is ineligible to receive benefits because he was employed in a major nontenured policy making or advisory position. We conclude that the Claimant is eligible for compensation and reverse.

Odato worked…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gahres v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Zerbe v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Conroy v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Perez v. N.M. Dep't of Workforce SolutionsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Lang v. Howard CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. NM Dept. of Workforce Solutions v. PerezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions v. PerezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Perez v. N.M. Dep't of Workforce SolutionsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API