Legal Opinion
Huyler's v. Ritz-Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Co. of Atlantic City
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 9, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, District Judge.
After the opinion of September 8th last was handed down (1 F.[2d] 491), the plaintiff, Huyler’s, by amendment changed the form of its action from ease to covenant. It then filed a new declaration, in which it relies upon the lease alone and seeks damages, special as well as general, for an alleged breach by the defendant, the Ritz-Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Company of Atlantic City, of those covenants of the lease whereby the defendant, as lessor, agreed to erect a building and give to the plaintiff, as lessee, possession of a specified portion-thereof. The defendant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roberts v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Neal v. JeffersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Herpolsheimer v. ChristopherNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Brewington v. LoughranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Kellogg v. MalickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lalekos v. MansetDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Burlington Transp. Co. v. JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Henry Pratt Co. v. Stoody Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Huyler's v. Ritz-Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Co. of Atlantic CityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1925
- (PC) Chester v. KingDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.