Legal Opinion

Sturkie v. Constance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 16, 1992No. 1894Published

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

Mary Lou Sturkie brought this action against Mr. and Mrs. Constance for injuries she received from a fall in the Con-stances’ home. Following a jury verdict for the Constances, Mrs. Sturkie appeals. We affirm.

The issues before us on appeal are whether the trial judge erred in refusing Mrs. Sturkie’s motion for a jury view of the accident scene and whether he erred in admitting into evidence the rug upon which Mrs. Sturkie allegedly slipped in light of the denial of the motion for a jury view.

The record reveals the following. On December 23,1988, Mrs. Sturkie arrived at Chicora…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Columbia v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API