Legal Opinion

Thames v. Thames

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 20, 2015No. 2140052PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

On March 25, 2014, JaNell Searcy Thames. (“JaNell”) filed a petition in the Montgomery Probate Court (“the probate court”) seeking to probate the will of her late husband, David Whetstone Thames (“the decedent”).1 Regions Bank, the named executor of the decedent’s will, declined to serve as executor. In her petition, JaNell sought to be appointed the personal representative of the decedent’s estate (“the estate”).

In April 2014, Mary Elizabeth Thames (“Mary Elizabeth”), Clinton Moye Thames (“Clinton”), and David W. Thames, Jr. (“David”), the decedent’s children from a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Hall v. MazzoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Ex Parte Master Boat Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Ogle v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Affinity Hospital, L.L.C. v. WillifordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. J.R.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  2. Campbell v. J.R.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  3. Engel v. AmonettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API