State v. Freeland

The appellant, Harry Free-land, was convicted and sentenced for manufacturing .intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes. He predicates his appeal, on bills of exception reserved to the refusal of the trial judge to give two special charges. In these charges the judge is requested to instruct himself that under the facts set forth therein the offense of manufacturing intoxicating liquor for. beverage purposes could not have beep committed.

The first special charge was refused on the ground that it was inapplicable to the facts. There is nothing in the record to show the contrary; hence we are…