Goldstein v. Barron

This is the latest in an increasingly long line of cases in a short period of time seeking explication of the language of G. L. c. 231, § 60B, inserted by St. 1975, c. 362, § 5, the statute concerned with medical malpractice tribunals.1 *645The statute is set forth in relevant part in the margin.2

The plaintiff has appealed from the orders of a single justice of this court denying his motion to file the required *646bond under § 60B late, allowing the defendants’ motion to appeal to the full court of the Appeals Court from orders of the Superior Court denying the defendants’ motions to dismiss, and…