Legal Opinion

Gundershein v. Bradley-Mahony Coal Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1946PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment dismissing the prior action brought in behalf of the infant plaintiff was ordered because of failure of diligent prosecution by the guardian ad litem. Since that judgment was not rendered upon the merits, it does not prevent the present action for the same cause of action (Civ. Prac. Act, § 482). Hence the present action, which was commenced within the period of the plaintiff’s infancy, is not barred by the Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prac. Act, § 49, subd. 6; § 60, subds. 1, 3).

The judgments should be reversed and the motions denied, with costs in all courts.

Loughran, Ch. J.,…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Niles v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
  2. Ziegler v. SerranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. LUCHINI BY AND THROUGH LUCHINI v. HarsanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Holley v. Mandate Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. In re the Estate of AlbinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API