Legal Opinion
Morgan v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 2, 2003No. A03A1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Presiding Judge.
Following a jury trial, Elduvall Morgan appeals his conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, OCGA § 16-13-30, contending that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and (2) the State improperly withheld exculpatory evidence in violation of his due process rights under Brady v. Maryland. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
1. Morgan contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We disagree.
On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be construed in a light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Eason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Gwinnett Health System, Inc. v. DeluCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003