Legal Opinion

Howard v. Lane

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 19, 2003No. S03A0282PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hines, Justice.

Paul Howard, the Fulton County District Attorney, has filed this appeal from the denial of a petition for a writ of prohibition. Finding that this Court is without jurisdiction to address this matter, we dismiss.

The State sought to prosecute Larry McGinty on a felony indictment. McGinty waived his right to a jury trial, and the State objected. The trial court, the Honorable Bensonetta Tipton Lane presiding, overruled the State’s objection. The State then, through Howard, sought a writ of prohibition to prevent Judge Lane from conducting the trial without a jury. The writ was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rebich v. MilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Berky v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  3. Collins v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  4. State v. TysonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. Moody v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leitch v. FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Lamar County v. E.T. Carlyle Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  4. MAGISTRATE COURT DEKALB COUNTY v. FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  5. State v. CardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API