Legal Opinion

MATTER OF ZACCARO v. Cahill

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 2003PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Read, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether due process requires actual notice before the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) designates a landowner’s property as a wetland and places it on a freshwater wetlands map. We hold that actual notice is not required so long as DEC complies with the statutory notice provisions of ECL 24-0301 (4) and (5), which are reasonably calculated to inform affected landowners that their property is located in a protected wetland. We further conclude that substantial evidence supports the DEC Commissioner’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. McCann v. ScadutoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Kennedy v. MossafaNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar, Inc. v. County of SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Oneida Indian Nation v. Madison CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Harner v. County of TiogaNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Orange County Commissioner of Finance v. HelsethNew York Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re the Foreclosure of Tax Liens By County of BroomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Kahen-Kashi v. RismanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API