Calais v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for rape of a female under the age of seventeen. Tex.Penal Code Ann. art. 21.09 (Vernon 1974). Punishment was assessed at twenty years.
In addition to the brief filed by appellant’s retained counsel, appellant has filed a pro se brief raising additional grounds of error. This pro se brief was neither timely filed nor filed with the clerk of the trial court. Under such circumstances, this court is not required to consider or review its contents. Tex.Code Crim.Pro. Ann. art. 40.09 § 9 (Vernon 1979); Stiehl v. State, 585 S.W.2d 716…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rudd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Landers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Robles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Holloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1982
- Garber v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984
- Cravens v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Gillett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.