Legal Opinion · Dissent

Prouse v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 2012No. COA12-160Published

1Dissent

HUNTER, Robert C., Judge,

dissenting.

I conclude the case on which the majority relies, Moore v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 191 N.C. App. 106, 664 S.E.2d 326, aff’d *120per curiam, 362 N.C. 673, 669 S.E.2d 321 (2008), is distinguishable from this case, and thus, I respectfully dissent.

The underlying complaint alleged that in June 2008 plaintiff James W. Prouse was a passenger in his employer’s vehicle traveling on Interstate 485 when the vehicle was struck by a moving vehicle tire that had fallen from another moving vehicle. The collision caused the driver of the vehicle in which Mr. Prouse was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Lowe v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API