State Of Washington, V Manuel Merino
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
FILED COURT OF APPR4LS OIVISIO u : II 2013 SEk 1. 0 t, 8: 1+ 0 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASIff DIVISION II BY STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 43339 -7 -II Respondent, v. MANUEL MERINO, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Appellant. PENOYAR, J. — Manuel Merino was convicted for two counts of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance, each with a school bus stop enhancement. Merino appeals only count 2, arguing that the State failed to provide sufficient evidence that he was an accomplice in the delivery. In his statement of additional grounds ( SAG), Merino argues that his counsel was ineffective…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.