Legal Opinion

State Of Washington, V Manuel Merino

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 10, 2013No. 43339-7Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

FILED COURT OF APPR4LS OIVISIO u : II 2013 SEk 1. 0 t, 8: 1+ 0 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASIff DIVISION II BY STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 43339 -7 -II Respondent, v. MANUEL MERINO, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Appellant. PENOYAR, J. — Manuel Merino was convicted for two counts of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance, each with a school bus stop enhancement. Merino appeals only count 2, arguing that the State failed to provide sufficient evidence that he was an accomplice in the delivery. In his statement of additional grounds ( SAG), Merino argues that his counsel was ineffective…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API