Legal Opinion

People v. Roth

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1990No. D009011PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, Acting P. J.

Following denial of his motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5), Gregory Thomas Roth entered a negotiated *213guilty plea pursuant to People v. West (1970) 3 Cal.3d 595 [91 Cal.Rptr. 385, 477 P.2d 409] to possession of a firearm by a felon (Pen. Code, § 12021). He appeals the denial of his suppression motion, contending the police officers acted illegally in detaining him and patting him down. We agree with the first contention, and reverse.

Factual and Procedural Background

The People’s Evidence

At about 1:20 a.m. on February 7, 1988, reserve Deputy Sheriff Mark…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Fare v. Tony C.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wilson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. AldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. GarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. P. v. Guyette CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. Cho CA6California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API