Legal Opinion

Fisher v. City of Anacortes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1919No. 15393PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Skagit county, Brawley, J., entered March 3, 1919, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained through a fall on a defective sidewalk.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent was injured by a fall upon the sidewalk of the appellant city, and in this action recovered in damages against the city in the sum of $950. The city appeals, assigning that the court erred, (1) in denying its motion to require the complaint to be made more definite and certain; (2) in denying its motion for a nonsuit; (3) in admitting certain evidence; and (4) in entering a judgment upon the verdict of the jury.

In her complaint, after setting forth the nature of the injuries she received from the fall, the respondent alleged that, “by reason of the pain and suffering she has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Stock v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. De Wald v. IngleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Billings v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hines v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Mathews v. City of La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Thompson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Clausing v. KershawWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Smith v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API