Legal Opinion
Sauls v. Freeman
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 15, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia county upon petition for rehearing. The facts are stated in the report of the main case.
1Opinion of the Court
The petition for a rehearing filed in this cause has been considered. It suggests nothing that had not been carefully considered by ns in reaching the conclusions set forth in the main opinion.
In so far as the petition is a reargnment or assumes any new ground or position not taken before, it is clearly in violation of Supreme Court Rule 21, and the practice of this court, as has been settled by the adjudications. Smith vs. Croom, 7 Fla., 180; First Nat. Bank vs. Ashmead, 2 So. Reptr., 665; s. c. 23 Fla., 379.
A rehearing is denied.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. CroomSupreme Court of Florida · 1857
- First National Bank v. AshmeadSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Warren v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- Florida Land Rock Phosphate Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- Texas Co. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- State, Ex Rel. Neafie v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
- Suwannee & San Pedro Railroad v. West Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.