Legal Opinion
Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In each case: Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and the action remitted to that court for determination upon questions of fact there raised (Civ. Prac. Act, § 606), with costs to abide the event, on the ground that in each case the evidence presents questions of fact as to the defendant's negligence, and in the first case as to freedom from contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff's intestate.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND and DYE, JJ. LEWIS and FULD, JJ., dissent in the first case upon the ground that the driver of the automobile was guilty of contributory…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gochee v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harshberger v. Associated Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Dorothy M. Harshberger, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harry Nelson Harshberger, Deceased v. Associated Transport, Inc., and Floyd Kenneth Spenton, Associated Transport, Inc. v. Dorothy M. Harshberger, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harry Nelson Harshberger, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Faust v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Kleinman v. FrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Korsak v. Curry Auto Rental, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960