Legal Opinion

State v. Kane

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1999No. 99-003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

¶ 1 In April, 1998, the State of Montana (the State) charged Patricia Lee Kane (Kane) by information, with Theft (Common Scheme), a felony, in violation of § 45-6-301(l)(c) and (8), MCA, for purposely or knowingly obtaining or exerting unauthorized control over funds and other items belonging to Bryan Hilger (Hilger) and used, concealed, or abandoned the funds/items knowing such activity probably would deprive the owner of it. Kane filed a motion to dismiss claiming that the funds referred to were checks drawn on a joint account making theft impossible as a matter of law. The State amended…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CurtisMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Booth v. Montana Twenty-First Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. HaackMontana Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DebusMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gurrola, Maria v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
  3. State v. DebusMontana Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API