Legal Opinion

Kim v. American Samoa Government

High Court of American Samoa

Decided December 17, 1990No. AP No. 5-90Published

1Opinion of the Court

This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial by the District Court of a court-appointed Korean interpreter for appellant’s trial on the charge of driving under the influence of alcohol. The appellant concedes that he is not indigent. There is no evidence in the record before us, with the possible exception of the fact that appellant’s counsel requested the appointment of an interpreter, of the extent of appellant’s ability or inability to speak or understand English or Samoan.

I. Jurisdiction

The appellee argues that we are without jurisdiction over this appeal because there has been no…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Helstoski v. MeanorSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API