Legal Opinion
Smith v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided September 22, 2004No. 03-03-00299-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.
Robert Smith appeals his conviction for the offense of delivery of a controlled substance, for which he was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. In four points of error, Smith contends that article 35.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure violates his right to equal protection by requiring him, but not the prosecution, to present a signed affidavit with his motion to quash the jury array; that the trial judge’s application of the statute violated his right to due process; that his motion to quash the jury array should have been granted because the use of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Kiss v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- Erron Deon Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Gary Dean Milne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- John Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.