Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 29, 1921No. 10318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Hughes County ; George C. Crump, Judge. Action by Minnie Duncan and another against R. J. Dixon to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff Duncan, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKbnnambr, J.

This action was instituted in the district court of Hughes county by Minnie Duncan, plaintiff, against R. J. Dixon, as defendant, to quiet title in the plaintiff to 40 acres of land described in her petition. The defendant, Dixon, filed answer and cross-petition. Charley Wade, by order of the court, was made a party plaintiff, and on the 18th day of January, 1918, the cause was tried to the court, and after the introduction of the evidence the cause was continued until the 28th day of January, 1918, when the court -entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Minnie Duncan, quieting her title…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Security Ins. Co. v. DrokeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Frost v. HaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. McKenna v. McHaleyOregon Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ashbrook v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Johnson v. PottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Culbertson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API