Legal Opinion

Stallings v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1934No. 12972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNKLIN, Chief Justice.

Testimony of the defendant was sufficient to require the court to submit to the jury the defense pleaded of false-and fraudulent representations inducing him to execute the contract. According to his testimony the alleged misrepresentations on which he relied were of the quality and fitness of the machine sold and concerning which defendant was wholly ignorant, and a finding of the jury in defendant's favor thereon would have supported the defense of failure of consideration, either in whole or in part. 10 Tex. Jur. pp. 153, 154, §§ 90-91; 6 Tex. Jur. p. 963, § 283, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reed v. HesterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. American National Bank v. CrugerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Carson v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Delaware Punch Co. of America v. ReinarzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Charles F. Curry and Company v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. Guerra v. BrumlowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Jonwilco, Inc. v. C.I.T. Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Guerra v. BrumlowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API