Legal Opinion

State v. Heney

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2013No. 26624PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Defendant Peter Heney was arrested and charged with possession of cocaine, possession of marijuana, and ingestion of marijuana. Before trial, Heney moved to suppress all evidence in the case as the fruit of an initial illegal search of his hotel room, alleging that all evidence discovered by police on a subsequent call to the hotel was tainted by the initial illegal search. The trial court granted the motion with respect to the drugs seized during the initial illegal search, but denied the motion with respect to evidence gathered during the second call to the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. FierroSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. McCahrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. EdwardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. Two HeartsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. TenoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API