Legal Opinion
Advance Cable Co. v. Cincinnati Insurancé
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 11, 2015No. Nos. 14-2620, 14-2748PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Chief Judge.
On April 3, 2011, Middleton, Wisconsin, was pelted with hail. Predictably, some structures were damaged, including the metal roof of a building located at 2113 Eagle Drive. The owners, Advance Cable Company and Pinehurst Commercial Investments (to which we refer collectively as Advance), submitted a claim to their insurance company, Cincinnati Insurance, but they were not satisfied with its response. Cincinnati took the position that the damage was cosmetic and thus excluded from the policy, while Advance thought the damage was more extensive and covered by the policy;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LangridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Brethorst v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Blum ex rel. Studinski v. 1st Auto & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Michael Beckem v. Indiana Family and Social SerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Black Earth Meat Market, LLC v. Village of Black EarthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Windridge of Naperville Condo v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Common Cause Indiana v. Individual Members of the Indiana Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Great Plains Ventures, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2016
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.