Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Silva

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Initially, we note that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in remitting this matter without explaining the grounds upon which the remittitur was made. In any event, this matter need not be remitted to the Supreme Court to clarify its order since it is clear that the determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York (hereinafter the Board) denying the petitioners’ application for a zoning variance was based on substantial evidence in the record as a whole and was neither illegal nor arbitrary and capricious.

As the Board properly determined, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Montalbano v. SilvaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Feit v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Karneil v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Capuana v. MahoneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API