Legal Opinion

In the Interest of S. D.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 31, 2012No. A12A0245PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boggs, Judge.

The Fulton County Department of Family and Children Services (“DFACS”) filed a deprivation complaint alleging that one-day-old S. D. was deprived because his teenage mother was herself in DFACS custody and was unable to care for the child. When S. D. was six days old, DFACS filed a deprivation petition. Following a hearing, the juvenile court found S. D. deprived and awarded temporary custody of the child to DFACS. The mother appeals,1 and for the reasons that follow, we reverse.

A deprived child is defined as a child who “[i]s without proper parental care or control, subsistence,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Graves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. Petkas v. GrizzardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  4. In the Interest of M. L. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. In the Interest of D. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Interest of D. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. In the Interest of M. T. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. In the Interest of C. H., ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  4. In the Interest of J. J.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. In the Interest of R. S. T.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API