Adelstein v. Roebling Construction Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
Plaintiff has recovered damages -for personal injuries. At the time of the accident plaintiff was an iron worker employed by the Prince Iron Works- engaged in some construction work on a building in Bast Seventy-fifth street. Defendant was engaged in the installation of concrete floors in the same building. Its men were installing such floors on the seventh floor. The method of construction is approximately as follows:
Iron girders bearing the floor were placed some six and a half feet apart. They were about fourteen feet long. They thus formed the side of an open panel fourteen feet by six…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Quigley v. . ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Caddy v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Stewart v. . FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Bohnhoff v. . FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Huston v. DobsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Broderick v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Miller v. DeWittAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Oldham v. KubinskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- Thon v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Frick v. O'Hare-Chicago Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.