Legal Opinion
Donofrio v. Hastings
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 12, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order reversed and application to suppress denied. Memorandum: We find no constitutional issue present in this action. Respondent’s right to due process is fully protected by the requirements of section 75 of the Civil Service Law. That statute establishes his right to counsel at the formal administrative hearing and due process does not require that the right to counsel be extended to preliminary investigative inquiries in disciplinary matters (Matter of Groban, 352 US 330; Matter of Popper v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y., 26 AD2d 871; see, also, Ann, 33 ALR3d 229,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re GrobanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wooldridge v. Greene CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Alpert v. GreccoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Cassone v. Westchester County Health Care Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- New York State Department of Transportation v. MattNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Rochester Police Department v. BerginAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979