Kramer v. Von Mitschke-Collande
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.
Thomas Kramer (“Kramer”) appeals from an order domesticating an adverse Swiss partial judgment in the amount of approximately $100 million. We affirm.
The facts underlying the instant litigation are set forth in Otto’s Heirs v. Kramer, 797 So.2d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). Under the applicable Florida statute, the Swiss partial judgment can be domesticated here if it is a “foreign judgment that is final and conclusive and enforceable where rendered, even though an appeal therefrom is pending or is subject to appeal.” § 55.603, Fla. Stat. (2004). A foreign judgment is defined simply as “any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Banque Libanaise Pour Le Commerce v. Hanna Elias KhreichCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Acoustic Innovations, Inc. v. SchaferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Dart v. BalaamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Otto's Heirs v. KramerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- TRANSPORTES AEREOS NACIONALES v. De BrenesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- Osorio v. Dole Food Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Eos Transport Inc. v. Agri-Source Fuels LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Flame S.A. v. Industrial Carriers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Kramer v. Von Mitschke-CollandeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.