Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Holcombe v. Stone

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 1, 1934No. 1 Div. 839PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The claim here involved arose out of fees charged under section 4768 of the Code of 1923, which reads as follows, to wit: “Allow- ¥ anee for officers attending and prosecuting condemnation proceedings; how taxed and paid. — There shall be allowed the officer making the seizure under a search warrant the sum allowed by section 4704, of three dollars, and also the sum of two dollars additional for every day that such officer shall necessarily be employed in attending court for the purpose of causing liquors seized to be condemned, and the sum of ten cents per mile for'…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Board of Revenue v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. County of Mobile v. PowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Holcombe v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API