Legal Opinion
Soetiono v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 14, 2011No. 10-1847PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Petitioners Iwan Soetiono and Fenny Ratnawati Ligito seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) final order of removal. For the following reasons, we will deny the petition,for review.1
I
Petitioners are husband and wife, and natives and citizens of Indonesia who entered the United States in August 2001, and stayed beyond the permissible period. Petitioners were thereafter issued a Notice to Appear and conceded removability. Soetiono (as the lead respondent) filed an application for asylum, withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) and,…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Olufemi Yussef Abdulai v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Wakkary v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Parastoo Fatin v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Imelda Laurencia Lie, Soyono Liem Andre, Yulius Suyono v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Takky Zubeda v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Fen Tjong Lie v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Henri Nababan v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Henri Nababan v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021