Legal Opinion

State v. Mowser

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 3, 1919PublishedCited by 46 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 91 N. J. L. 395.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kalisch, J.

The facts which give rise to the fundamental question raised in this case are these: Mowser, the plaintiff in error, with two companions, Herbert and McCracken, conspired together to rob one Richards. Mowser knew Richards; his confederates did not. On the night of the robbery Herbert and McCracken lay in wait for Richards near the latter’s home. Mowser came along and notified Herbert that Richards was coming np the street and then proceeded on his way. As Richards came by Herbert and McCracken followed him for a short distance, and then…

2Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. State v. ChernickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API