Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Claim of Horton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 13, 1983Published

1Dissent

Casey and Levine, JJ.

dissent and vote to affirm in the following memorandum by Casey, J. Casey, J. (dissenting). We cannot agree that the board erred in finding that claimant had good cause for leaving his employment. Claimant was employed as a salesman on a straight commission basis. The record contains proof that after working five days per week for 22 weeks and earning no more than $700 in commissions during that period, with no commissions in the last three weeks, claimant quit in order to look for other employment which would provide sufficient compensation to support himself and his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  2. In Re the Claim of BusNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. In re SellersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  4. In re the Claim of CroweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  5. In re the Claim of CroweNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API