Legal Opinion

Wells v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1931No. 21421PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. The first special ground of the motion for a new trial is based upon alleged newly discovered evidence of S. F. Gordon. This evidence can not be newly discovered. The affidavit of Gordon shows that he was present prior to the trial and heard a conversation between the defendant and Jessie Zorn relative to the stolen property. See Steel v. State, 149 Ga. 134 (2) (99 S. E. 305). This ground of the motion is incomplete. In Kinnebrew v. State, 81 Ga. 765 (2) (7 S. E. 691), the Supreme Court said: “It is not sufficient for the accused to state in his affidavit that he did not know the facts so…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Manchester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  5. Gaulden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. FerrierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API