Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of John Doe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 2, 1989No. 88-15455 (Sealed Case)PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before TANG, THOMPSON and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant John Doe is a target of a grand jury investigation. 1 Mary Roe, an attorney, represented Doe in certain proceedings in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The grand jury subpoenaed Roe. Doe moved to quash the subpoena on the ground that the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine prevented disclosure. of the information the grand jury sought from attorney Roe. The government opposed the motion. It contended the crime-fraud exception…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- In Re JOHN DOE CORPORATION. JOHN DOE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- In Re Antitrust Grand JuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re Motions of Dow Jones & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of the CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re: Grand Jury Proceedings 5 Empanelled January 28, 2004 United States of America v. Under Seal, and Under Seal, Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re GRAND JURY SUBPOENACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.