Legal Opinion

Glinsey v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 30, 1973No. C 70-735PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BATTTSTI, Chief Judge.

This cause presents a question of law which must be determined prior to trial: Whether the absence of statutory railroad signals imposes strict liability upon the defendant railroad for the loss proximately caused by violation of ORC §§ 4955.32 and 4955.34, so that contributory negligence is not a defense.

Section 4955.32 reads:

“Every company shall attach to each locomotive engine passing upon its railroad a bell of the ordinary size in use on such engines and a steam or compressed air whistle. When an engine in motion and approaching a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coray v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Verberg v. Board of Education of the City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Bevin v. GriffithsOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. John F. Newcomb, Administrator of the Estate of Herman L. Wahn, Deceased v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  5. McCallie v. New York Central Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Levorne Glinsey, Adm'x v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  2. Maxine W. Siegferth, Guardian of Robert H. Siegferth, an Incompetent Person v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API