Legal Opinion

Welch v. Huddleston

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1949No. 33295Published

1Opinion of the CourtLuttrell, J.

The decisive question presented on this appeal is whether plaintiff could maintain this action. The trial court held that she could and rendered judgment in her favor, and defendant appeals.

Essential facts established by the evidence are that on August 18, 1945, one Abbott, a used car dealer in Tulsa, sold to plaintiff, Mrs. C. R. Huddleston, without warranty, a 1941 Ford automobile at a price in excess of the ceiling price permitted by the regulations of the Office of. Price Administration. Plaintiff purchased the car for use as a taxicab, and it was used in a taxicab line operated by her in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lightbody v. RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Allen v. WaltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API