Fulton County v. Atlanta Envelope Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
The defendant contends that, under the allegations of the petition, the suit was for a penalty and not a suit for rent under the terms of the contract. In this connection it must be kept in mind that, if the defendant went beyond the term-of use of the property in question as provided by the contract, the $3,000 could not be prorated under the terms of the contract. The defendant contends that in ruling on the demurrers the court should have, as a matter of law, construed the contract as a contract which provides for a penalty. We construe the contract as a specific contract for rental for a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miazza v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Rowell v. Harrell Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Dart v. Southwestern Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Military Armament Corporation v. Itt Terryphone CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd. — 1 v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd. — 1 v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd. — 1 v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988