Legal Opinion

Fulton County v. Atlanta Envelope Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 16, 1954No. 35203PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.

The defendant contends that, under the allegations of the petition, the suit was for a penalty and not a suit for rent under the terms of the contract. In this connection it must be kept in mind that, if the defendant went beyond the term-of use of the property in question as provided by the contract, the $3,000 could not be prorated under the terms of the contract. The defendant contends that in ruling on the demurrers the court should have, as a matter of law, construed the contract as a contract which provides for a penalty. We construe the contract as a specific contract for rental for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miazza v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Rowell v. Harrell Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  3. Dart v. Southwestern Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Military Armament Corporation v. Itt Terryphone CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd. — 1 v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd. — 1 v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. First Capital Institutional Real Estate, Ltd. — 1 v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API