Legal Opinion

Cohee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 2, 1997No. F-96-329Published

1Opinion of the Court

942 P.2d 211 (1997)

Larry Darnell COHEE, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-96-329.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

May 22, 1997.

Order Granting Rehearing for Limited Purpose July 2, 1997.

Charles J. Migliorino, Burke Mordy, Ardmore, for Defendant at trial.

Dennis Gay, Assistant District Attorney, Ardmore, for State at trial.

W.A. Drew Edmondson, Attorney General, Nathan L. Dills, Assistant Attorney General, Oklahoma City, for Appellee on appeal.

Burke Mordy, Ardmore, for Appellant on appeal.

SUMMARY OPINION

2Per curiam 1

Larry Darnell Cohee was tried by jury and convicted of Unlawful Delivery of a…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lumpkin; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lumpkin; Concurrence; Per curiam 2.

3Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API