Legal Opinion

Madison v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 27, 2009No. Misc. Action 07-289 (RMC)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Defendant District of Columbia has asked the Court to reconsider or, in the alternative, to alter or amend its judgment that the District of Columbia violated the Jury System Improvements Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1875 (“Juror Act”) when it terminated Christine Madison’s employment with the Operations Department of the District of Columbia State Education Office (“SEO”) 1 shortly after she had completed jury service in a six-month long trial. The Court will grant in part and deny in part the District’s motion to amend judgment. Specifically, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Fernandez-Vargas v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Fox v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API