Legal Opinion

McCullough v. McCullough

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 20, 1945No. 4 Div. 375PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

The bill as amended is in essence one -by a personal representative to enforce an equity of redemption of real estate owned by his intestate mortgagor.

Generally, the equitable right of redemption belongs to one who has an interest in the premises and would be a loser by foreclosing (42 C.J. 357, § 2091) or who owns the mortgagor’s equity of redemption or any subsisting interest therein by privity of title with him by purchase, inheritance or otherwise. Butts v. Broughton, 72 Ala. 294.

The personal property, so far as adequate for that purpose, is the natural fund out of which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Butts v. BroughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Cross v. Bank of EnsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Foster v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Pitts v. DarbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Gay v. FlemingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Central Credit UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. McCary v. CrumptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Cooper v. PeakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Ross v. RogersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. Gadsden Brick Company v. CranfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API