Rigal v. Levine
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Roberto Rigal appeals from an order of final summary judgment. We affirm. Sections 772.14 and 775.089, Florida Statutes (1993 and Supp.1994) “estop a defendant from denying the essential elements of a crime in a subsequent civil proceeding involving the same matters.” J & P Transp., Inc. v. Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y., 750 So.2d 752 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). In the *638criminal case that involved the same matter, the jury determined, and on appeal this court held, that Rigal was not a partner who was entitled to take a share of the firm’s money. See Rigal v. State, 780 So.2d 256, 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- J & P TRANSP., INC. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Rigal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001