Legal Opinion

Burgher v. Chrisman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 21, 1980No. 20608PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Chief Justice.

Russell Burgher has appealed from a permanent injunction restraining him from competing with his former employer, Big State Exterminating Company, until March 11,1982. The trial court has declined to fix the amount of the supersedeas bond required to suspend the judgment pending the appeal under rule 364(e) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Burgher now applies to this court for a writ of mandamus directing the judge to fix the amount of the bond. We grant the writ of mandamus.

The rule is well established that on appeal from an order granting a permanent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ammex Warehouse Company v. ArcherTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ex Parte G.O. KimbroughTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. General Telephone Co. of the Southwest v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elizondo v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
  2. Elizondo v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
  3. in Re Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. and MacRophage Therapeutics, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API