Legal Opinion

Smith v. COMMANDING OFFICER, 1ST BATTALIAN, 23D MAR., ETC.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 1, 1974No. Civ. 74-H-1016Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:

HANNAY, District Judge.

I

Petitioners, reservists in the United States Marine Corps, soon face Annual Training Duty with that component of the armed forces and seek federal equity relief against a Marine regulation that forbids the use of short-hair wigs during that two-week period of constant military duty.

Although federal courts are properly reluctant to interpose in matters that are legitimate to the military function, Reaves v. Ainsworth, 219 U.S. 296, 31 S.Ct. 230, 55 L.Ed. 225, this Court is not prepared at this time to hold that Petitioners’ contention is frivolous…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Capt. Milbert Mindes v. Dr. Robert C. Seaman, Secretary of the United States Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Karr v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Reaves v. AinsworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Joe Richard Lansdale v. Tyler Junior College and Harry E. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Pvt. E2 Donald Jack Anderson, Ng26382581 v. Melvin LairdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API