Legal Opinion

Dudney v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 15, 1860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Laiorence Circuit Court. Hon. William C. Bevens, Circuit Judge. Even unnecessary allegations in an indictment must be proven as laid. 4 Eng. 195; 5 Eng. 259. An erroneous instruction calculated to mislead the jury is ground for reversal. 6 Eng. 1 9; 16 Ark. 309. It was unnecessary to name the particular game played, and its averment may, therefore, be regarded as surplusage not requiring proof. Vanderworker vs. State, 13 Ark. 700; 18 Ark. 540.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Compton

The appellant was convicted in the court below, and fined fifty dollars, for keeping a common gaming house; a motion for a new trial'having been made and overruled, he appealed to this court.

The indictment charges that the appellant unlawfully did keep and maintain a certain common gaming house, and unlawfully and wilfully did cause and procure divers idle and evil disposed persons to frequent said house and to play together at certain unlawful games at cards called pocre, upon which money was bet, ete. It was proven on the trial that divers persons had frequently met together, and engaged in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Starchman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  2. State v. RadmilovichMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Value v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API