Legal Opinion

Qualcomm, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2011No. 83673-6PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

¶1 Qualcomm Inc. sells the “OmniTRACS” system to trucking companies. The system includes hardware, software, and a service that collects, manipulates, and transmits data from the trucks to the companies’ dispatch centers. Under our tax system, the legislature imposes different business and occupation (B&O) tax rates depending on the nature of the business. Thus the “retailing B&O” tax rate is lower than the “service B&O” tax rate. Similarly, retail sales tax applies to some transactions but not others. “Network telephone services,” as defined by statute, are subject to both retailing B&O tax…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma Department of FinancingWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Gartner, Inc. v. Wa State Dept. Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. Fpr Ii, Llc v. State Of Washington Dept Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. Landis+GYR Midwest Inc., V. State Department Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  5. Walter Dorwin Teague Associates, Inc., V State Of Wa, Dept. Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API