Legal Opinion
South Buffalo Stores, Inc. v. W. T. Grant Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 8, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaloney, J.
The plaintiff herein demands judgment against the defendants that they be restrained by permanent injunction from conducting a shoe department in connection with the defendant Grant’s general business, which is that of a five-cent to a dollar retail department store.
Defendant Kreitner and defendant Shea Realty Corporation on December 10, 1928, were the owners of record of five parcels of land or 177 feet of frontage, situate on the northwest side of Seneca street between Buffum and Zittel streets, in the city of Buffalo, N. Y., defendant Kreitner owning three of the five parcels and defendant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Trustees of Columbia College v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Gibert v. . PetelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Parker v. LevinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Booth v. . KnipeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Mott v. . OppenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Banos v. WinkelsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- South Buffalo Stores, Inc. v. W. T. Grant Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Cranes-Mayos Clothes, Inc. v. Street Road Shopping Center, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1970
- Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966